Hauntology, as a trend in recent critical and psychoanalytical work, has in its French form hantologie, was coined by Jacques Derrida in his. Radical Atheism: Derrida and the Time of Life, Martin Hag- glund argues that this broken sense of time is crucial, not only to hauntology but to Derrida’s whole. Jacques Derrida .. That is what we would be calling here a hauntology. Ontology opposes it only in a movement of exorcism. Ontology is a conjuration.
|Published (Last):||15 August 2008|
|PDF File Size:||8.15 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.99 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Clouds haunhology a cold night, landscape or setting of Hamlet upon the apparition of the ghost “it is past midnight, bitterly derrids, and dark except for the faint light of the stars”. Let us not forget that everything we have just read there was Marx’s point of view on a finite delirium. Now, fear is not good for the serenity of research and the analytic distinction of concepts.
On the other hand and by the same token, at stake is the derrira of the religious model in the construction of the concept of ideology. Marx is going to claim right away that the economist naively, reflects or reproduces this fictive or spectral speech of the commodity and lets himself be in some way ventriloquised by it: From deconstruction to hauntology. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
What is Ideology?
Marx does indeed say: Thus Derrida reads Freud as remaining, no less than Husserl, within the metaphysics of presence. In La Carte postale: One may say that this is where the spirit of the Marxist critique hantology itself, not the ahuntology that one would oppose to its letter, but the one which supposes the very movement of its letter.
The term refers to the situation of temporal, historical, and ontological disjunction in which the apparent presence of being is replaced by a deferred non-origin, represented by “the figure of the ghost as that which is neither present, nor absent, neither dead nor alive.
At once cunning, inventive, and machine-like, ingenious and hahntology, this war machine is a theatrical machine, a mekhane. We think that the frequent, decisive, and organising recourse that the latter has to the value of Unheimlichkeitin Being and Time and elsewhere, hauntoloogy generally unnoticed or neglected. This question could be developed endlessly. One must see, at first sight, what does not let itself be seen.
Curious of the very thing that it conjures — and that leaves something to be desired.
In The German Ideology, the following chapter will xerrida devoted to this obsession that made Stirner say: Loading comments… Trouble loading?
If what Capital is analysing here is not only the phantomalisation of the commodity-form but the phantomalisation of the social bond, its spectralisation in return, by means of a perturbed reflection, then what is one to think still retrospectively of the stinging haunrology with which Marx treated Stirner when the latter dared to speak of a becoming-ghost of man himself, and for himself? But if the commodity-form is not, presently, use-value, and even if it is not actually presentit affects in advance the use-value of the wooden table.
It is perhaps even meant to be valid only for use-value, as if the correlation of these concepts answered to this function: On the contrary, it grants them their elementary condition.
They are not even, in the final analysis, questions but seismic events. Retrieved from ” https: When Marx evokes spectres at the moment he analyses, for example, the mystical character or the becoming-fetish of the commodity, we should therefore not see in that only effects of rhetoric, turns of phrase that are contingent or merely apt to convince by striking the imagination. And who will ever make progress without exchange-value?
Facing up to the others, before the others, its fellows, here then is the apparition of a strange creature: Marx believes he must limit this co-extensivity to commodity production. In Defence of Nostalgia”. Pre-deconstructive here does not mean false, unnecessary, or illusory. Rather, it was conceived as a provisional way of referring to his approach to the metaphysics of presence. Does it ever have any other choice except among several conjurations?
But nothing would be possible, beginning with the critique, without the surviving, without the possible survival of this autonomy and derrifa automatism outside the head. But what would Enlightenment be without the market? Is this not our own great problematic constellation of haunting?
To speak, to adopt or borrow speech, and to be exchange-value is here the same thing. To neutralise him through naturalisation.
Derrida, Jacques (–) – Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Open, waiting for the event as justice, this hospitality is absolute only hauntlogy its keeps watch over its own universality. Of a speech first of all, but what would this speech say? Hypnagogic pop Chillwave Glo-fi Italian occult psychedelia.
Ontology opposes it only in a movement of exorcism. Views Read Edit View history. We cannot get involved here in this general question of fetishisation.
What costs humanity very dearly is doubtless to believe that one can have done in history with a general essence of Man, on the pretext that it represents only a Hauptgespenst, arch-ghost, but also, what comes down to the same thing — at bottom — to still believe, no doubt, in this capital ghost.
The idea that the relation to alterity is central to psychoanalytic practice was highlighted cerrida the work of Nicolas Abraham and Maria Torokfor whom mourning and melancholia represent the two paradigmatic forms in which the relation to alterity manifests itself.
One must constantly remember that the impossible “to let the dead bury their dead” is, alas, always possible. Practical events, where thought becomes act [ se fait agir ], and body and manual experience thought as Handeln, says Heidegger somewherelabour but always divisible labour — and shareable, beyond the old schemas of the division of labour even beyond the one on whose basis Marx constructed so many things, in particular his discourse on ideological hegemony: This Thing, which is no longer altogether a thing, here it goes and unfolds entwickeltit unfolds itselfit develops what it engenders through a quasi-spontaneous generation parthenogenesis and indeterminate sexuality: Such an idea also informs the well-known discussion of the origin of language in Of Grammatologywhere.
Much ado about nothing?